Tag: "twitter"

The Image of Neda

The Image of Neda

NedaMy good friend and parter David Henderson was on top of this story from the very beginning.  This is a tragedy in Iran that should have never of happened.

From the blog of David Henderson -

Much of the world has kept track of events in Iran following the questionable outcome of elections there on June 12 via Twitter. With severe restrictions by the regime in Iran on media coverage and apathy by the news media in the West, Twitter has served to redefine how many of us view the concept of media in the Internet era.

It is no longer about some editor or TV producer making decisions for us but rather we are sharing information and drawing our own conclusions.

Nothing has been more profound, in my opinion, than watching video of a young woman named Neda Salehi Aghasoltan die on the streets of Tehran yesterday.

Neda

She was a student of philosophies at Tehran University. According to reports, she was shot by a police sniper while standing with her university professor, watching protesters.

The video is haunting, especially her last moment alive when she looked at the camera as if to seek our help. At least that was what I saw in her eyes.

The story of Neda is being heard around the world today, carried first – with a few exceptions – not by the sleepy, slow-moving traditional news media but by people, sharing on Twitter and online.

Comments from blog post, “Twitter, A National Conversation? Not!”

It seems I have hit a topic that touch home. Thought these comments on my blog post, Twitter, A National Conversation? Not!,  from the IABC Linked-In Group were worth sharing, as well as one left on my site directly.   As the standard disclaimer goes, the opinions posted in this blog are not necessarily those of the blog’s owner.   But everyone should have the right to say and stand-up for their beliefs.

  1. Matthew Tinkham

    Not bad – topical anyway. Hey Ed – wanna buy a car?

    By Matthew Tinkham Sr. Comms Rep at BAE Systems

     

  2. Catherine Gordon

    Sorry Ed, have to disagree. Yes, there are lots of people out there shilling, but there’s also a core group of people using Twitter to share ideas and connect with people who are pursuing similar goals. Usually people trying to move social and business innovation to another level. It’s great, and effective.

    By Catherine Gordon Founding partner & president, SimpleLogic Inc.
  3. Steve Seager

    You tease, you. Why did you post this topic Ed? To get traffic for your blogpost? To advertise your photography? Or was it to spark a conversation? :)  

    I’m with Catherine here. Just because some to make money from a new communication tool doesn’t automatically make it invalid. As for conversation and social media: if the publishing of thoughts and ideas doesn’t require interaction, these responses wouldn’t exist. And you wouldn’t have bothered posting your blog topic. 

    I love social media. The opportunity to use a new communications tool has certainly opened new opportunities for me, and the clients I work for. If nothing else, it levels the playing field somewhat and gives mass media a good run for it’s money. Here’s to the future. It is social, you know :)

    By Steve Seager Freelance Communications Consultant
  4. Twitter is a tool like any other. Sometimes it’s used for good, sometimes for evil. Sometimes good people use it, some use it to spam, flog, annoy and harass. 

    I totally get the concept that it’s mere self-promotion– but why would that surprise anyone? And, yes, the marketers will get their mitts on it and try to make it into another billable channel for advertising – that’s a foregone conclusion. 

    But it’s possible to use it skillfully if one understands its role in fulfilling objectives. I don’t twitter (yet) — still waiting on the Web site, blog and opening a checking account for my brand new business. But I can see how using Twitter can reach some people…

    By Sean Williams CEO at Communication AMMO, Inc.

     

  5. Ken Norkin

    Wrong, Ed. 

    There are plenty of conversations happening on Twitter and Facebook. They’re just not happening in real time the way interactions traditionally occurred. But they’re there just the same. Tweets posted and responded to on Twitter. People writing on each other’s walls on Facebook. All out in the open for everyone to follow. Maybe you’re not looking hard enough. 

    Every Tweet or post — even the most self-promotional — is in fact an open invitation to anyone to respond and turn it into a conversation. That that doesn’t happen with every message posted doesn’t mean conversations aren’t happening.

    …and this posting from my website…..

    2 Comment(s)

    1. On Apr 14, 2009Barb Sawyers said:Finally, some common sense. Instead of bowing to the pressure to tweet, I can spend time on activities that make sense.

    2. On Apr 16, 2009Joanne Dant, Senior Associate, October Strategies said:

      I have found Twitter to be a good tool for research and learning, however I am in complete agreement on the rudeness of tweeting while listening to a speaker. I find it very disappointing to see so many people glued to their phones “tweeting” while they should be giving full attention to the speaker.

Twitter, A National Conversation?  Not!

Twitter, A National Conversation? Not!

rs_set3Tune into CNN any weekday afternoon and you will see Rick Sanchez promote his stint at the anchor desk as a “National Conversation” because readers can Twitter, Facebook or MySpace instant reactions to CNN stories. During the course of the broadcast Rick will stumble his way through trying to read often-unintelligible usernames, and the off the cuff comments. A “National Conversation”, not.

Last time I checked my Merriam-Webster dictionary, not Wikipedia, the definition of conversation went something like this:

(1): Oral exchange of sentiments, observations, opinions, or ideas (2): an instance of such exchange

Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and other social media are not conversations. Conversations require two key elements, the use of speech and interaction between live individuals.

Social media is not a conversation; it is the random placement of self-promoting thoughts and ideas that require no interaction. Instead, it can be compared to the equivalent of a billion online used car salesmen all-trying to grab your attention as you drive by their dealerships. Say whatever, and say it over, and over and over again, anything to get a customer’s attention.

I am not implying that the social media is an evil or threatening. It is a new communication tool in its infancy, and like all babies it will grow up. What we see today, is not what it will be next year or five years down the road. How we develop the new media is important.

Companies, media and individuals are flocking to twitter and other social media. Self proclaimed “social media” experts are more abundant than jobs for the unemployed. Watch any twitter role for 10 minutes and you will see at least two or three posts by the same self-proclaimed experts touting one way or another they can help you or your company make money using social media.

Facebook's New Terms of Service Questionable.

Facebook’s New Terms of Service Questionable.

021509-005-facebook158Twitter is all abuzz with the new terms of service agreement for Facebook. It used to be when you cancelled your Facebook account, the information you posted on Facebook would be deleted. Not anymore. The new terms state that anything you post on Facebook now becomes their property, and they have the right to use it, even after you leave the service.

Facebook’s terms of service (TOS) used to say that when you closed an account on their network, any rights they claimed to the original content you uploaded would expire. Not anymore.

Now, anything you upload to Facebook can be used by Facebook in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later. Want to close your account? Good for you, but Facebook still has the right to do whatever it wants with your old content. They can even sublicense it if they want.

The Social Facts about Facebook, LinkedIn and Plaxo.

The Social Facts about Facebook, LinkedIn and Plaxo.

socialAfter a couple of months of social networking I have ready to make some calls on what will and will not succeed as viable social networking in today’s erratic economy.

My first exposure to the social network platform was an invite from a business colleague to join LinkedIn.Com. After exploring the site, and what it had to offer I was intrigued. I especially like the daily updates to what I am doing, and the ability to join special interest groups such as IABC and PRSA. The downside of LinkedIn was that only a limited amount of features were available for free.

To fully access all of the sites features, such as email, profile review and reference searches, a fee range of $249/year to $4999/year is charged.

During the same time frame I also signed up on Facebook.Com. Word on the street about Facebook was that it was a much more social network, and not that conducive for business connections. It had all the same features as LinkedIn, without any of the fees.
The same special interest groups like IABC and PRSA are available on Facebook.

What makes Facebook unique is ability to actually be social and interact. Free exchange of notes, email, links but most important the ability to easily post and exchange photos and videos.s20531316728_5806

Facebook makes it easy to find friends and make new ones. In just a month I have added my cousin Marianne Huerter in Houston, an old client, John King, one the founders of Perot Systems and the daughters of my best friend growing up in Topeka, Ks. I have also added new friends like Jean Cochran of NPR and Bob Pearson at Dell.

Adding friends is not the key, I have done about the same on Linked, the key is that on Facebook we actually communicate, weekly, daily, hourly. Often more frequently than we should. Facebook also has an excellent iPhone application that makes it way to easy to keep up with everyone while on the go.

After a month of using both services, I am fully convinced me that LinkedIn is a social network model that fails mainly because it fails to be social. Operators of LinkedIn are hoping to cash in on the list of free contacts, and reselling that list to those willing to pay. There is really little or no benefit for those using the free service.pic_logo_119x32

Oh yes, I forgot about Plaxo.Com, mainly because Plaxo.Com is very forgettable.

A social network aimed at the artistic community, Plaxo is a model that is somewhere between Facebook and LinkedIn. A free site with has some added features that do require a monthly premium, it falls drastically short in fulfilling the social networking needs. I have found very few worthwhile contacts on the website. It seems the majority of those on that sign up for the service do not even fully fill out there profile, much less interact.p_logo

For the moment I will continue to make status updates and try to find contacts, but I seriously doubt the worth of expending too much effort on the Plaxo site.

If you want to have a successful online social life, my suggestion is to bookmark Facebook. If you add Twitter to that you will have a twitterful good time, but then again that is a topic for another online social comment.